M. Rick Turner, the dean of African-American affairs, announced his retirement yesterday, and, as usual, he did it his own way. Not quite two weeks after he was suspended from his position when the University learned of a pretrial diversion agreement with federal prosecutors, Turner announced his retirement through a University-issued statement that included no mention of his recent problems.
When one avoids a trial for misleading federal authorities on the activities of a “known drug dealer,” common sense would dictate that you get your side of the story out in the open. But like in many instances, Turner did not do the commonsensical thing — he has not spoken to the media at all to clarify his agreement in the apparent hope that the controversy will go away. As everyone knows, however, controversy has a way of following around Rick Turner. In searching for his replacement, University administrators must keep in mind the negative consequences of Turner’s independent streak.
With the University’s graduation rate for black students as the most obvious example, Turner can point to many great accomplishments during his career here. Indeed, it seems as though Turner’s supporters were always pointing to those accomplishments, because someone was always calling for his head. While Turner charred the landscape with his particular brand of invective, the impressive achievements of the Office of African-American Affairs kept him anchored. Turner presented a double-edged sword: a loose cannon who kept his position because he was good at his job. In the next OAAA dean, University administrators should seek to find someone who brings the same enthusiasm and love for the office’s mission without carrying the extra baggage.
Turner repeatedly described his role as an advocate for black students, and he adhered to that description through an outspokenness that was often hurtful, sometimes even targeting black students themselves. If it sounds unusual that an employee was allowed a blank check to publicly define his or her purposes within an organization, that’s because it is — at the University, that was a liberty extended to Turner and essentially no one else. When Turner appointed himself the University’s own racial provocateur, no one effectively scaled him back, even after the creation of the position of vice president for diversity and equity, which was placed in charge of spearheading the University’s dialogue on race. The University, and not the next OAAA dean, should be firmly in charge of defining the office’s role around the University’s priorities: to foster a welcoming environment for black students, provide academic support and address the unique needs of that student community.
In his 18 years here, M. Rick Turner helped the University accomplish many great things, but his early retirement nonetheless offers a good opportunity for the OAAA and the University to move forward. In hiring a new dean for this new era, University administrators should seek out someone committed primarily to the University’s vision as the University has defined it. Most importantly, the University must find someone who can offer Turner’s talent and energy but also respect others’ rules. That the OAAA is perceived to the on the front lines of battling the University’s race problems does not justify a carte blanche to that office’s dean. Next time, there is no excuse for bringing on an OAAA dean whose continued employment requires excuse after excuse.