
Marcus Martin, Interim Vice President of the Office for Diversity and Equity. Photo courtesy University Relations.
In recent months the Office of Diversity and Equity has transitioned to new leadership after this past summer’s resignation of Bill Harvey, the University’s first Vice President for Diversity and Equity. This change in administration — which came almost four years after the office’s creation — has provided administrators and student leaders time to reflect about the impact University officials have had on the creation of a diverse, inclusive community on Grounds.
How the office came to be
During the early hours of Feb. 26, 2003 at around 2 a.m., Daisy Lundy, a minority student running for Student Council president, was allegedly assaulted in a racially motivated attack. The attack shocked the University community and prompted University President John T. Casteen, III to deliver a statement the following morning.
In that statement, Casteen said the incident “left many, African-American students in particular, feeling vulnerable and afraid.”
He also asked all University community members to take a stand against acts of intolerance and violence.
“We continue our work to create an open and civil community,” Casteen continued. “That work now takes on a new urgency to which we will respond with renewed resolve and vigor.”
With this impetus, the University later conducted a year-long Commission on Diversity and Equity that reported its findings in a June 11, 2004 Board of Visitors meeting.
“Today’s reality is that, all too often, we encounter a negative racial climate at the University and within the Charlottesville community,” Commission co-Chairs Angela M. Davis and Michael J. Smith said in a statement to the Board at the time.
The commission spent a year in “intensive consultations, meetings, and study,” according to the statement. As a result of its findings, the Commission recommended the creation of an Office for Diversity and Equity.

William Harvey, Former Vice President of the Office for Diversity and Equity since 2003. Photo courtesy University Relations.
The search for a leader
Following the recommendation, the University set out to find its first Vice President of Diversity and Equity, eventually selecting Harvey, said Marcus Martin, current interim Vice President for Diversity and Equity. Harvey had previously served as director of the Center for Advancement of Racial and Ethnic Equity, an initiative of the American Council of Education that seeks to promote diversity at all levels of higher education.
“Bill had a successful record of advocacy,” said Martin, who helped in the search for Harvey.
With its appointment of Harvey in October of 2005, the Office of Diversity and Equity was created to “promote diversity and equity as pillars of excellence,” Martin said.
2005 to Present: An office at work
From 2005 until his resignation this past summer, Harvey worked to establish the office as a body that actively promotes diversity throughout the University community.
“The Office provides “consultation, coordination, and assistance to various organizations and University constituents,” Martin said.
One of those organizations is the Office of African American Affairs. African American Affairs Dean Maurice Apprey cited three components of diversity. The first is diversity from the standpoints of affirmative action and University policies. The second, he said, is a desire to foster a sense of multicultural “inclusion” within the University community. The third component is diversity as an educational value.
The Office of African American Affairs is an example of the promotion of diversity from an “inclusion” standpoint because it helps ensure that black students feel welcome at the University, Apprey said. The University has had the highest black student graduation rate among public colleges and universities for 15 years running — which indicates the office has been successful in its aim to promote inclusion, Apprey said.
The Office of Diversity and Equity, though, does not focus on any of these three points alone, Martin said. The Office promotes all three of the aspects of diversity that Apprey described, but is not directly involved in the recruitment of faculty, staff or students, Martin said.
How the Office’s policies are intended to affect the different aspects of diversity can be seen in some of the office’s broader goals, including “promoting an inclusive, welcoming, respectful environment, and embracing diversity and equity as core values tied to the University’s priorities,” as well as “encouraging commitment to academic diversity,” Martin said.
To accomplish these broad goals, the Office has five committees that each have a unique focus to promote different aspects of diversity. One of those committees, Martin said, is the Diversity Council, which was created “to provide a forum where representatives from the community could come together to discuss strategies to make the community more welcoming.”
In addition to administrative forums, the Office has sponsored numerous community engagement events in its short history and has plans for a large symposium this spring that will focus on topics such as gender issues and media effects related to diversity and equity.
The Office of Diversity and Equity also plays an important role in the Virginia-North Carolina Alliance for Minority Participation. This alliance encourages more minority students to graduate with degrees in science, engineering and math, areas in which minorities are underrepresented. Without the Office of Diversity and Equity’s involvement, the University might never have become part of the Alliance, Martin said.
The various workings of the Office of Diversity and Equity are all part of the University’s larger goal to create a culture of “inclusive excellence,” Martin said. “Diversity must be a part of excellence, not apart from excellence,” he said.
How effective is the University in promoting Diversity?
Martin said he believes that the University, and his office in particular, has succeeded in increasing the University’s overall diversity — although there is still work to be done.
“Having been here 14 years I truly believe that U.Va. has become a more inclusive institution,” Martin said.
Martin cited the many community events sponsored by his office, collaborations with student groups, various community outreach efforts and his office’s input in developing “a global curriculum” at the University.
Black Student Alliance President Lauren Boswell agreed that the University has successfully promoted diversity on Grounds, noting that the Office of Diversity and Equity has been one of her group’s biggest supporters.
Indian Student Association President Mitika Garg said the University “does a great job of empowering us to address diversity issues.”
The administration, however, strongly emphasizes student self-governance, and as a result “there’s only so much the administration can do,” Garg said.
Asian Student Union President Jigar Patel said although the Office of Diversity and Equity is very helpful, his group mostly interacts with the Dean of Students.
Overall, Patel said that from his perspective, “the University is doing its part.” He said, though, there is still room for improvement.
“For us to grow as an institution we’re going to have to focus more of our efforts on diversity,” Patel said.
Seth Kaye, president of Queer and Allied Activism, added that the University could potentially do a better job of preventing problems, instead of just solving them as they arise. For example, he noted that his group was frustrated with the University police for not immediately sending out an e-mail after two gay students had been the victims of a hate crime last April.
“They were helpful after we went to them,” Kaye said.
Although he acknowledges that there exists room to improve, Martin said the University’s creation of his position almost four years ago shows that it has taken a much more proactive role to foster diversity than in the past. He hopes its actions will make the University a much more inclusive and open institution.
“At the end of the day [we hope that] anyone can say ‘This is my school,’” Martin said.
UVa is a shining example of the complete failure of affirmative action. There is still a black part of campus, a black part of the cafeteria, a place in tuttle where all the asians hang out, and of course the frat area where all the white people (and non-white ppl who conform to white, southern culture) hang out.
The University needs to re-evaluate how it assesses diversity. Can we please acknowledge that just because a person is black doesn’t make them diverse, and just because someone is white doesn’t mean they lack diversity? I think that the University sees Diversity as a means, rather than an end. To me, Diversity is an END, and the means is individualism. To me there are two crucial aspects of diversity: individualism and the rejection of group orientation (collectivism, conformity, frats, organizations). People at UVa identify themselves as members of groups, rather than individuals with aspirations outside of the group context.
THE UNIVERSITY WILL NEVER BE DIVERSE so long as group think, tradition, conformity, elitism, and collectivism are the norm.
The University doesn’t need more black people, asian people, etc. It needs more individuals who are willing to keep their individualism is the face of group context and group think. At the same time, it needs less individuals who dress, act, and think in the same manner as the person next to them.
When the student body is largely dressing, thinking, and acting as individuals, rather than as members of this race, that organization, this frat, or that ethnicity, the student body will be diverse.
Over the last 20 years, the University has completely failed to produce great people. (Our most famous alumni is a former football player who talked shit on his coach then quit on a Super Bowl team, which only made him look like the elitist that he is). The University isn’t producing great people because so many of the students are system people, that take the conformist route. 3/4 of the Comm school kids seem like mini Donald Trumps, always in line with conventional society. The University needs less of these people. It needs more Mark Cuban wannabees, people that are willing to become GREAT their own way, outside of convention.
CLAS ’08
Report this comment
Agree/Disagree:
0
0
Diversity can certainly be seen as means to an end, and that end is a better academic environment, and that end is exactly what our administration should strive for.
I don’t really think that the University is different from every other part of the world in that people here like to be a parts of groups. That is something that is due to the hyper social nature of humans, and perhaps magnified at the college level where intelligent young people are surrounded by thousands of other intelligent young people. I don’t think University students aspire to be parts of groups or that their aspirations lay solely in groups, rather their membership in these groups is something that occurs naturally, and their greater aspirations lie outside of the groups. In the majority of the student groups you mention, you will find a group of students with a wide variety of majors and extracurricular interests.
My final qualm with your comment is your saying that the University has failed to produce great people. That is an extraordinarily bold claim, and one that is completely unjustified (and certainly not justified by your NFL player example).
Oh and how do you put the way people dress on the same level as “thinking, and acting as individuals?”
Report this comment
Agree/Disagree:
0
0
If we take seriously the Founder’s mission for the University, to be a public resource for building democracy in a new world, sustaining diversity is the purpose of the University. And, as the Founder specified – in his First Inaugural (in which he was educating the public about the nature of our self-governance) -diverse minorities must be protected and included within our political and social system, not merely tolerated. Diversity, then, is not primarly a means to something else (e.g. higher higher graduation rates, higher rankings among peer institutions, etc) or an achievement to be completed, marked off the list, and noted in a report. Sustaining diversity is the purpose of the University, and should be its creative energy, certainly in a global 21st century. Dr Martin’s helpful term ‘inclusive excellence’ is a metaphor for this purpose of the University. Among the questions we might then ask: who has been excluded from participating in the benefits of the University’s purpose, and why? does the University live its purpose of inclusive excellence when it acts as an arm and agency of legislated oppression of disfavored groups (e.g. racial minorities, gender minorities, sexual minorities, religious minorities) does the University live its purpose of inclusive excellence when some constituents/contributors to the University’s mission are valued highly and other constituents/contributors are valued poorly? does inclusive excellence extend to engagement with community neighbors and other citizens in forms and ways that expand shared mission and mutual benefit rather than privileging and rewarding a few? etc …
Report this comment
Agree/Disagree:
0
0
With regards to this idea of “Inclusive Excellence”. Before the University works on including people, it needs to break down the barriers which exclude people.
As a white, straight guy, who felt prejudice and exclusion everyday at UVa, I will tell you that it is Culture and Tradition that excludes people, not race, religion, gender, or sexuality. I was excluded because the person I am did not even remotely fit into the narrow, traditional culture of UVa. Cultural familiarity heavily determines social interaction at UVa. Where I’m from, culture simply doesn’t matter. My culture is different from my neighbor, my best friend, etc., and it doesn’t matter. Punks hang out with wiggers, wiggers hang with preps, preps hang out with punks. Can you imagine a bus driver at UVa hanging out with a dude in Sigma Chi? That’ll be the day.
Just remember, the ideas of inclusion and exclusion imply that there is something to be included in, or to fit into. I believe if the culture was more broad, and the range of people was more expansive, inclusion vs exclusion would be a moot point.
Report this comment
Agree/Disagree:
0
0