The Faculty Senate unanimously voted last Wednesday to endorse giving University faculty members more rights to their published works and allowing those articles to be more accessible to the public.
The Senate voted to do so through its Resolution on Scholarly Publication and Author’s Rights, which states that faculty members may provide electronic versions of their work for an open access electronic repository. This facility will be run by the University Library, the Office of the Provost and the Faculty Senate’s Task Force on Scholarly Publications and Authors’ Rights.
History Prof. Allan Megill, a Faculty Senate member, said the repository will need to be planned and organized carefully. He added, though, that it has the potential to be a valuable resource.
“I look forward to the appearance of the repository; I think it will be a benefit for U.Va faculty,” he said.
The Open Access policy was a revision of a resolution on scholarly publications that was brought to the Faculty Senate last November, Task Force Chair Brian Pusser said. Originally, the resolution said participation would be mandatory by default but that faculty members could sign a waiver to opt out of it. The policy then was revised so that faculty members simply could decide if they wanted to contribute to the repository, Pusser said.
This change was made in part because some faculty members had reservations about how a mandatory initiative would affect scholarly journals, he said. Moreover, some faculty members might not have been comfortable with the requirement to negotiate with publishers for open access rights, he said.
Overall, the repository could be beneficial not only for open access and collaboration but also for professors.
“For many faculty members, when they sign contracts with publishers, they automatically give up their rights to their works,” University Librarian Karin Wittenborg said. “This repository is a resource for them to use.”
Currently, the repository is being tested and may be available for use next fall, she added.
THE UNIVERSITY’S MANDATE TO MANDATE OPEN ACCESS
Pity there was no one there to inform the UVa Faculty that they could have Open Access, and an Open Access Mandate, without having to renegotiate rights with their publishers.
I hope it’s not too late. Here are a few sources of information that may help. Unmandated deposit policies do not work; the years if hoping for spontaneous deposit by simply encouraging it are lost years of OA for UVa.
Which Green OA Mandate Is Optimal?
http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/
The Immediate-Deposit/Optional-Access (ID/OA) Mandate: Rationale and Model
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/71-guid.html
Harnad, S. (2008) Waking OA’s “Slumbering Giant”: The University’s Mandate To Mandate Open Access. New Review of Information Networking, 14 (1). pp. 51-68.
http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/17298/
Good Luck!
Stevan Harnad
Agree/Disagree:
0
0