Banner

Leaning left

Ideologically unbalanced universities risk blinding students to opposing views

THERE is nothing better than being a conservative at the University. Just enough like-minded individuals are present on Grounds to make one's political life bearable, while sufficient opposition exists to fully vet one's worldview by graduation. Being the political minority on Grounds does not place conservative students at a disadvantage. Rather, numerous personal benefits accrue to individuals who hold a minority political persuasion during their college years. As a conservative at a predominantly liberal institution, you learn to defend your beliefs, withstand intellectual challenges and adapt your worldview when someone presents a persuasive counterpoint.

I worry, however, that my liberal peers do not garner the same political benefits from their college experiences. The University appears to be a very insular culture, with liberal perspectives overrepresented compared to those from the right. Consider the 2008 presidential election when President Obama received 78 percent of the vote in Charlottesville, compared to 53 percent statewide. If those election results are any indication, then the Charlottesville community, including the scores of students who switched their registration to vote here, clearly shows a preference for liberal politics that is not representative of views statewide.

Universities historically have been hotbeds of political liberalism, and that continues today. "Professors are more likely to identify themselves as liberals than those in any other occupation," according to a recent article in The New York Times, which cites information from a study performed by Neil Gross and Ethan Fosse. Approximately 43 percent of professors identify themselves as liberal, compared to 9 percent who identify themselves as conservative.

Does this political bias impact the experience of the average college student? An article from Inside Higher Ed cites a study by Gordon Hewitt of Hamilton College and Mack Mariani of Xavier University that indicates between entering college and graduating student political ideology does shift slightly to the left. The study tracked changes in student political orientation over time to determine if political indoctrination was occurring on college campuses. The article says, however, "Whether the students attended a college that was more liberal or conservative did not correlate with the shift - which it would have had liberal professors been engaged in indoctrination." This study indicates that there is no systematic trend of discrimination against conservative students that can be traced to faculty perspectives.

The study is interesting not necessarily because of its conclusions, but because of its assumptions. The fact that individuals sympathetic to liberal ideology dominate higher education is taken as a given, and the students' political shift to the left over the course of their education does not concern the authors so long as the shift cannot be attributed to faculty influence.

Strangely enough, I agree with the conclusions drawn by Inside Higher Ed. So what if liberals control universities? The real problem is not that one viewpoint is overrepresented, but that those who hold the viewpoint consider their worldview to be reality, rather than simply a lens through which they interpret the world.

Both liberals and conservatives are susceptible to this type of closed-mindedness. As soon as an idea that threatens the favored view of reality is proposed, the idea is assaulted - often along with its source - and swiftly disregarded. What makes the threat of this intellectual rabidity so dangerous on university campuses is that universities should be nurseries for uncommon ideas.

The whole point of education is to broaden the mind in the hope that new solutions will be developed for the problems facing society. That requires healthy debate and the ability of individuals to voice their opinions without being shouted down.

For me, the ideal of the Academical Village is encompassed in a quote written by Evelyn Beatrice Hall when describing the philosophy of Voltaire: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."  The risk inherent in a University dominated by one ideology is that we lose respect for those who hold opposing views. Students never should dismiss a minority viewpoint without first rationally considering its value. Sometimes, the most easily disregarded ideas are those that come closest to the truth.

Ginny Robinson's column appears Wednesdays in The Cavalier Daily. She can be reached at g.robinson@cavalierdaily.com.


Published April 13, 2011 in Opinion

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

An academic
(04/13/11 6:43pm)
Report
Comment

Somehow I attached this comment to the wrong editorial. Here it is attached to the correct one:

You implicitly assume that the two viewpoints, conservative and liberal, are of equal merit and should be equally represented in a given population. One feature that characterizes people in academe is a penchant for analysis, be it in terms of literary criticism or the sciences or whatever. There is an adherence to the Jeffersonian doctrine “Here [at the University of Virginia] we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.” It is the results of such reasoned analyses that lead academics to be predominantly (but not universally) liberal rather than conservative.


UVAGrad
(04/13/11 6:44pm)
Report
Comment

Maybe higher education is dominated by and students in higher education shift to the left during the course of their education because....they are more educated.

Maybe people of a liberal persuasion are drawn to higher ed because...they value education.

It is nice however to see that 11 years after I left the University, someone would actually consider it "liberal." I don't think anyone would have characterized it as such when I was there.


Sean
(04/14/11 4:36pm)
Report
Comment

Ginny Robinson gets some rare props from me for daring to notice the obvious. It's not surprising that a few smug, self contratulatory defenders of the Ivy Tower didn't like the fact that she did. I don't call myself a conservative, or a liberal, but I can see the isolated, well paid, secure Ivy Towers in universities for what they are.

A lot of them are people who simply couldn't mke it in the private sector. A lot of others are in fields that either have microscopic or non existent indurstries in the private sector. Working 10-4 Monday to Thursday 8 months a year and collecting six figure salaries while the younger generation goes hopelessly into debt paying you is a pretty good gig - if you can score one.

I love this new appeal they've got now that they were trounced in the last election: everyone who votes against us is ignorant. Please, by all means, keep it up. Say it more and more about people who honestly disagree with you. Please.

Myself and my two co authors (5 degrees between us, and counting) have submitted an Initiative to the UVA administration featuring that very quote, so called academic. They have run like hell from the vast majority of scientofic claims that we made against them. They don't value science or education. They don't even value the health and well being of their own student body. And they have no answers. The one answer they gave us is that 7 published scientific studies carry more wieght that 29 others refuting their findings. This is UVA's "new math." 11 out of 14 points, they simply could not address at all.

This is not liberal or conservative, but indeed - we are wiping the floor with this partisan liberal university. And we are appealing to science and reason in ways that embarrass them.

www.uvalies.org/initiative


Person
(04/14/11 6:10pm)
Report
Comment

I graduated 3 years ago. When I left there was no way the University could be called liberal. Sure, the majority of student are liberals, but the University as a whole is conservative. All of the people in power - the Boosters, honor committee, the administration, etc.) are conservative. The people who influence culture and policy are conservative. The culture of UVa is conservative, and people all over the country will tell you that. It is one of the most conservative schools in the nation, point blank.


Really?
(04/14/11 7:14pm)
Report
Comment

Of course this is a conservative school. Ginny just doesn't understand that this is the twenty-first century. Her sexist and homophobic pieces are not going to fly among a well educated student body.


Anonymous3
(04/14/11 8:22pm)
Report
Comment

Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains. - Winston Churchill

Professors and others in academia, actors, musicians, artists, etc. never really grow up. They remain liberal because their beliefs are never questioned in their environment. This article is spot-on.


Mary
(04/19/11 6:38pm)
Report
Comment

College is about trying and testing new ideas away from where you grew up. The reason people tend to lean to the left when they go to school is because they become confronted with new, different ways of thinking about things and come into contact with people with vastly different experiences than their own. This tends to open minds to thoughts not widely disseminated in their hometown. After graduation, they return home and tend to forget the radical politics/mindset/etc. that they had during college and other things take priority (family, getting married, job, etc.). \nPersonally, I don't think it has anything really to do with university professors, who tend to stay in groups that inherently bounce ideas off of each other (after all, that is what academia is) and therefore reinforce their point of view. It's not about not being questioned, because otherwise you'd have to say the entirety of the academic system, internationally and nationally, would have a bias since they interact through meetings, lectures, symposiums, etc. And if you accept this as true, which I have a hard time believing, then you would have to question whether the belief you hold that is different than those is really correct. Especially in the science field but also in many other areas, these professors and scientists are in an environment where they challenge each other on every detail. \nBut I digress. \nThese professors aren't going to convince me any more than my parents. Who people associate with while in school has a much stronger impact on how a person is than who is telling them the history of Western Europe. It's only when you're removed from this environment do things start to shift, usually in the more conservative direction.



Powered by powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News