One of the less talked about issues for many University students is sexually transmitted diseases or infections among college students — an issue related to sex education, as we wrote about earlier this week. At the University, STI screenings are relatively accessible and, it appears, taken advantage of by the student body, though there is always room for improvement when it comes to the promotion of sexual health.
First, it is important to understand what STI screenings are. An STI screening is a test for someone who has no visible symptoms, and includes tests for chlamydia, gonorrhea and HIV, as well as syphilis or possibly hepatitis in high-risk situations, according to Dr. Christine M. Peterson, director of the Gynecology Clinic at the Elson Student Health Center. Such screenings are not comprehensive — notably, herpes is not included in this list.
While STI screenings don’t cover all areas of sexual health, they are still a good place to start. But one element of STI screenings that can be cumbersome is the question of cost. Student Health does not provide free STI screenings, and it seems unlikely that this will happen in the future. According to Dr. Peterson, Student Health doesn’t have the budget to do so, since lab tests are costly and Student Health receives no money from the state or the University, but is instead supported by student fees. The upside to the situation is, of course, that insurance policies — which the University mandates students to have — should cover the cost of STI screenings, as required by the Affordable Care Act. But this gets complicated with the cost of deductibles and different policies that may apply to international students.
Another barrier, Peterson says, “is that many students are covered by their parents’ insurance.” For these students, getting tested is also a question of parental involvement — something that suggests free, or low-cost (and not insurance-based) testing, may be helpful.
Despite cost and familial obstacles, students appear to get STI screenings in significant numbers. In her department of Student Health, Peterson estimates between 1,000-2,000 students get tested per year, strong numbers considering not all students choose to get tested at Student Health and may go elsewhere. (Peterson also noted that, of the women tested, those who tested positively for an STI were largely consistent with the national average.)
It appears University students do not contract STIs in larger numbers than students at other schools, and that there is a strong population of students knowledgeable enough about STIs to seek appropriate information. This is likely furthered by Student Health’s marketing about STI screenings, included not only on the Student Health website but also in places like the Stall Seat Journal and through Peer Health Educators. Although we may be doing well comparatively, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t seek more ways to promote screenings and subsidies to make them more affordable. According to Peterson, “We do understand that testing is very expensive, and we are working extremely hard to find a source of inexpensive testing for people who don’t want to use their insurance.”
Some kind of subsidy would certainly alleviate some of these issues, and this could come in the form of grants or donations — or funding from the University outside what’s allocated through student fees. While members of Student Health seek to address this issue, it is certainly laudable that many students and health administrators seem invested in sexual health.
Read More
EDITORIAL: Scapegoating students will not stop hazing
By Editorial Board | 14 hours agoInstead of retroactively responding to extreme hazing allegations, we, and especially the University, must begin asking more probing questions about the role of fraternal organizations on Grounds.
EDITORIAL: Celebrating and reflecting on The Cavalier Daily’s independence
By Editorial Board | 6 days agoOur independence grants us the ability to ask the hard questions and to say what University representatives cannot.
ARRAS: U.Va. must revise the Sexual Assault Prevention Training module
By Aoife Arras | April 17, 2024In addition to its failures in interactivity, the module lacks details specific to the University and discusses key concepts in universal terms.
