To the Editor:
The Cavalier Daily was right to argue a lecturer's criticism of Black Lives Matter was protected by the First Amendment in its Oct. 10 editorial.
Doug Muir’s criticism of BLM as supposedly being racist was protected by the First Amendment, under court rulings like Dube v. State University of New York (1990). That ruling concluded a professor had a First Amendment right to repeatedly declare that Zionism is racism. His speech was protected even though it infuriated many.
Worse speech has been held protected. In Levin v. Harleston (1992), an appeals court ruled the First Amendment protected a professor whose published "writings contained a number of denigrating comments concerning the intelligence and social characteristics of blacks."
Sincerely,
Hans Bader
CLAS ‘91
Read More
EDITORIAL: Celebrating and reflecting on The Cavalier Daily’s independence
By Editorial Board | 4 days agoOur independence grants us the ability to ask the hard questions and to say what University representatives cannot.
ARRAS: U.Va. must revise the Sexual Assault Prevention Training module
By Aoife Arras | 5 days agoIn addition to its failures in interactivity, the module lacks details specific to the University and discusses key concepts in universal terms.
EDITORIAL: Pedestrian safety is an institutional imperative
By Editorial Board | April 15, 2024Amid a national crisis of pedestrian safety, Charlottesville and the University are also struggling to properly maintain pedestrian safety.
