The Cavalier Daily
Serving the University Community Since 1890

A crisis in confidence

Professional self-doubt is a bigger concern for humanities

The sick man of the University was dying. The times called for a heightened interest in hard sciences, mathematics and engineering for the sake of global dominance. And although the Iron Curtain had already fallen, its great hero again took the stage, taking an encore to champion the humanities. The bold Winston Churchill faced an audience at MIT in 1949, declaring, "No technical knowledge can outweigh knowledge of the humanities in the gaining of which philosophy and history walk hand in hand." The academic Cold War had begun. There was no longer the threat of burning books; it would be enough simply to forget them.

If the humanities have always faced the possibility of being worthless, in recent years they have sustained themselves with a new role: defining their own relevance. What are the humanities and how do they differ, if at all, from the social sciences? What does it mean to provide a liberal arts education? Like most debates, these discussions about the humanities are muddled with vague rhetoric, such as "culture" and "critical thinking."

These conversations occur on false premises. Arguments in favor of the humanities come from intellectuals defending their own positions - professors firing from the Western canon. We hear from scholars so obscure that they must be important. Are all these fields really necessary? And if they are, should not we have heard about them? When someone mentions the theorist Georg Luk

Comments

Latest Podcast

Today, we sit down with both the president and treasurer of the Virginia women's club basketball team to discuss everything from making free throws to recent increased viewership in women's basketball.