The news story "Top Schools Get Subpar Ratings" in the Dec. 2 Cavalier Daily does not mention - but readers ought to know - that the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, which criticized U.Va.'s curriculum and that of so many others, is an organization dedicated to the promotion of conservative values in academe. Its board of directors is dominated by conservative activists. The organization campaigns against "political correctness" in universities; it promotes the fiction that conservative professors are routinely fired for speaking their minds, while warning darkly that there are many "Ward Churchills" on American faculties - the implication being, it seems, that leftist professors ought to be fired for their views, just as Churchill was fired from the University of Colorado after making inflammatory remarks about the 9/11 attacks. ACTA also campaigns in favor of curricular rigidity, favoring broad courses required of all students; in the humanities it advocates such requirements as Shakespeare courses for English majors while deploring the proliferation of courses in such subjects as theory, children's literature, media studies and gender.
Readers interested in understanding the ideological biases of ACTA's "What Will They Learn?" report can find all the information they need on the organization's website, https://www.goacta.org/.
Peter Baker\nEnglish professor
Read More
GILLIKIN and JOHNSON: U.Va., please rescind your Federal Executive Institute bid
By Steven L. Johnson and Matthew Gillikin | YesterdayBy withdrawing its competing bid and endorsing the Charlottesville City Schools’ bid, the University has a high-profile opportunity to strengthen its partnership with Charlottesville City Schools.
GARVIE: Commend the University’s continuous care for the environment
By Adeline Garvie | 3 days agoWe must applaud the University for the efforts they are continuously making to be more sustainable.
CARTER: Did anyone actually want VERVE?
By Nathaniel Carter | April 19, 2025While VERVE may shift student demand closer to Grounds, whether housing market effects will outweigh the harms of the University’s expanding presence is a gamble Charlottesville residents may not wish to take.
