Amid campus anxiety over racial tensions, University lecturer Douglas Muir recently compared Black Lives Matter to the Ku Klux Klan on social media. His comment rightfully spawned outrage from many in our community; he is now taking leave from the Engineering School, a move we support. It is important for members of our community, in particular those hired by the University, to voice their opinions respectfully. Though Muir was not fired, it is important to recognize that political speech, especially when made outside the classroom, should not be a fireable offense.
As a lecturer and the owner of local restaurant Bella’s, Muir is a reminder that our academic and social spaces are still unwelcoming to some. Black Student Alliance President Bryanna Miller responded to the incident by saying Muir is “not the only faculty member with ignorant and prejudicial views.” Condemning public expression of these views, as the University and students have done, sends a signal to other faculty members that racism is not welcome here on Grounds.
Comparing Black Lives Matter to the KKK is, most charitably, ill-informed; at worst, it’s egregiously offensive to a contemporary civil rights movement and those supporting it. Muir’s comparison, while noxious, constitutes a political statement. While we strongly condemn his views, we acknowledge his right to voice them — in particular outside the classroom — just as we support students protesting them.
Academic freedom and an inclusive academic community are two values which, as we’ve seen in this situation, are difficult to preserve at the same time in totality. For the sake of promoting a healthy learning environment, we should consider better diversity and sensitivity training for University faculty, as well as continue the ongoing effort to hire more non-white and female faculty members in the first place. The more individuals from these perspectives can voice their opinions, the easier it will be for more diverse voices to drown out ignorant speech. With enough debate, our community can achieve the most informed understanding of contentious issues — precisely the aim of an institution built upon academic freedom.
Read More
ARRAS: U.Va. must revise the Sexual Assault Prevention Training module
By Aoife Arras | YesterdayIn addition to its failures in interactivity, the module lacks details specific to the University and discusses key concepts in universal terms.
EDITORIAL: Pedestrian safety is an institutional imperative
By Editorial Board | 3 days agoAmid a national crisis of pedestrian safety, Charlottesville and the University are also struggling to properly maintain pedestrian safety.
YOUNIS: The danger of dehumanizing language
By Ayat Younis | 5 days agoThe administration’s failure to condemn blatant discrimination exacerbates an impossible situation, fostering an atmosphere that misinterprets pro-Palestinian sentiments as support of terrorism.
