In response to Friday’s letter (“Double standard,” Nov. 7) and Tuesday’s Opinion column (Michelle Lamont, “The wrong kind of change,” Nov. 11): advocates of homosexual marriage rarely use valid arguments to advance their cause. They point out that courts “forced people to comply with unpopular [racial desegregation] changes”, but ignore the fact that the court was fulfilling its purpose by enforcing law, not personal opinion. Segregation was wrong because it restricted Constitutional rights for arbitrary reasons. Interracial marriage is acceptable because marriage is not defined by race, but by gender. When terms like “religious tyranny,” “second-class citizens,” “subservient” and comparisons to racial inequality are hurled by activists, it is inaccurate and insulting, especially to those who bled for racial equality.
Equal rights already exist because marriage laws are applied equally, regardless of sexual orientation. When someone cries for “marriage equality,” the burden of proof is on them to justify the redefinition of the law and marriage as it is currently defined (whether explicitly or implied through common law and practice). This is especially true considering the centrality of the family unit to our society, history, identity and younger citizens, who would be inherently affected. While marriage draws its meaning from religion, history shows that marriage can be independent of it, which (in practice) is how a great many Americans treat it, including atheists who oppose homosexual marriage.
Also, it is not surprising that Lamont is disillusioned after projecting her hopes for this issue upon a “blank slate candidate” with a one-word campaign slogan.
Travis Dennis
CLAS 2012
Read More
LETTER: Misunderstanding the Honor Committee’s mental health procedures
By Seamus Oliver and Alexander Church | March 15, 2024We recognize that the Honor process can be stressful and that any student may benefit from support, regardless of an underlying health condition.
LETTER: Mischaracterizing a tangled war
By Michael Liebermann | February 2, 2024We should not address this war with blind idealism. We should address it, instead, with nuance and care.
P.U.M.P.K.I.N. SOCIETY: Happy Halloween 2023
By P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society | October 31, 2023The P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society Recognizes Individuals Who Enrich The University Community Through Their Silent And Selfless Service.
