Tawdry anaylsis
The toughest part of responding to Hung Vu's column ("Lighting Up," March 16) is knowing where to begin. Vu proves to be a difficult writer to endure grammatically and a master of logical non sequitur. Even less impressively, his simplistic attack on President John T. Casteen, III reveals a glaring ignorance of political history and corporate governance. Perhaps worst of all, Vu takes it upon himself to ascribe motive to Casteen's decisions, and he cannot manage to do it respectfully or with any trace of humility.