Banner

Football faux pas

Unlike most everyone else, I remained in Scott Stadium as the final seconds trickled off the clock and the score became official: 26-14, in favor of William and Mary. I had walked into the stadium, like everyone else, exuding confidence and with the assurance that this would be a sure victory, one that might put the Cavs on the positive track this season. After the first touchdown, any fears of an upset were assuaged. Three minutes hadn't ticked off the clock yet. Fast-forward to when there were three minutes left on the clock and the Sea of Orange was flooding out the gates like the dam had burst. I, and those few with me as the mass exodus trounced past us, stood jaw-dropped and awestruck at what had happened. In three years of watching U.Va. football, I've seen some spectacular things; none of them topped (or rather, bottomed) this display, this very disgrace to the sport of football.

I come from Oklahoma City, the heart of the midwest where football equals your quality of manhood. My grandfather was the first national championship quarterback at the University of Oklahoma, my father played at the University of Colorado, and there was a time where I had to decide if I wanted to pursue a quarterbacking career at a smaller college. Football is in my blood, but I say this to make an important point. That I know the sport gives me no authority to make rash, 'arm-chair quarterback' criticisms at every turn in a game. The facts aforementioned mean I'm slightly more authoritative in this realm than your average 8 year old girl. I was always slow to disparage Al Groh and U.Va. football because I understand (to a scaled down degree) the going-ons behind the scenes. A bad play call here, a horrible pass there, while my friends would groan in agony at every little mistake, I reserved judgement. Now, the time for judgement is rapidly approaching.

This was the first time William and Mary has beaten a D-1 football school in eleven years. It's U.Va.'s first loss to a subdivision team since 1986. We fumbled snaps from shotgun formation. Our spread offense was outrageously ineffective. We went through three quarterbacks.

Three quarterbacks! It's the position I know best, and therefore understand that, for the layman, it unfairly overshadows other vital parts of the offense. But the fact remains that the quarterback is the leader on the field, the person that starts every play and touches the ball every down. If you can't decide who will lead, can you possibly win? Jameel Sewell, who failed out of the University after the 2007 season, was revived of his downfall in a move I can't quite understand. Why did we bring him back? He was the starting quarterback for a winning season, sure, but one that set records for its low scoring margin and was ranked 101st in total offense of 119 teams. Makes you wonder if, perhaps, Chris Long was the leader that season?

Next season we started Peter Lalich, an all around screw-up. Everyone and their sister knew it. These are supposed to be the guys kids put posters of up on their walls. Not only were these supposed-to-be leaders doing anything but lead, there was a string of other incidents involving U.Va. football players getting into serious trouble off the field. One had to begin to wonder about the health of the U.Va. football program. Surely, these players were exemptions on the U.Va. football team as a whole, but they were also exemptions that were starting players, the big names that most people recognized.

Barry Switzer is a renowned football coach in Oklahoma; the man knew how to win football games. He also had to retire because he had no control over his players, who were bona-fide criminals in football jerseys, and he didn't want to babysit them. Al Groh has had the crime and lack of team leadership of Barry Switzer, minus the winning. Upstanding demeanors Sunday through Friday reflect strongly on Saturday.

I heard someone say while exiting, "The only good thing about this is that Groh is definitely through." I don't know if he will, or should, get fired, and if the "Groh must go" crowd will finally get their way. I do know he needs to turn things around, and fast. He needs a quarterback who can keep a team inspired not for a game, but a season. He needs to be able to get his team respectable off the field as well as on. Like I said, I'm slow to criticize, so I won't say he needs to be sacked today or act like coaching isn't incredibly difficult. But the straw is starting to pile up on this camel's back. Seasons have started worse and turned better many, many times in football history, so I dare not boycott every game for the rest of this season, so long as the changes that need to happen, do.

Reed Arnold\nCLAS III

Clarification: An earlier version of this letter incorrectly stated that Lalich "had clear chemical dependencies." During Lalich's time at the University, there was no evidence to support the assertion that he had a dependency on any chemical substance.\n


Published September 10, 2009 in Letters, Opinion

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

Katie
(09/11/09 1:15am)
Report
Comment

One of the UVA football criminals of which you speak was a former neighbor of mine until he was booted out of school. He was initially investigated for robbing stereo equipment from another student's car ON GROUNDS (if you're stuff isn't safe on grounds, the hallowed arena of the honor code, where IS it safe?) and in the process was also found, along with his roommates, to be in possession of marijuana and other illegal substances. They were loud and rowdy most nights of the week, so needless to say, we were happy to see them go.

In terms of Jameel Sewell...well, if we bring back a player who failed out of school, Groh can no longer stand behind his bogus "higher academic standards" excuse. Clearly, not only do Groh's players lack moral fiber and strong principles, he does as well. Sewell should have stayed away and UVA should at least play with the honor we so espouse, especially if we can't play for wins.

This type of behavior and moral compromise is something I expect from other schools (think Florida schools (Miami...), and OU as you mentioned), not from Mr. Jefferson's university. And how terrible for us to compromise our morals for wins, and then not win? We come out looking like fools, and I personally would rather stand the moral high ground than compromise our principles, period, but especially when we compromise them for nothing.

Plus, UVA is sinking WAY too much money into this football program for the performance we're getting--it's time to pay a coach who can do a lot better with the players both on and off the field. Groh actually MUST go.


Reed Arnold
(09/12/09 12:04pm)
Report
Comment

Sewell is a very talented athlete, don't get me wrong, and I'm not averse to second chances generally. But it just seems like, after a year away, we had a chance to prime a new quarterback who has longer staying power and might be a better leader.

And I would be slow to judge all of Groh's players; I know a few that are some of the kindest people I know. But there were those bad apples that needed to have a closer watch on them, and while it's unfair to say they're Groh's responsibility, someone needs to make sure they aren't... breaking into cars, for goodness sakes. I think Groh has done some ill-advised things, perhaps, but he's also had some bad luck. It was his players that turned the ball over 7 times, not him. You could argue, and people have, that he should have prepared them better, but these guys are working four to six hours a day. They just completely derailed.

So we'll see how this game goes this afternoon. UVa is known to lose to the bad team and compete with the good. So, like i said, don't give up hope in a season after the first game, because changes can be made.



Powered by powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News