In her column (“Pointless preservation,” Oct. 8), Amelia Meyer refers to the restoration of the Lawn and Range rooms as “pointless preservation.” Public and private institutions in possession of historic structures must make difficult choices about how to balance the demands of preservation with other objectives.
Meyer admits that “maintaining the integrity of the buildings” is “an acceptable undertaking worth the cost,” but it follows that the use of authentic building materials and methods is a part of such maintenance. The preservation of the Academical Village — a World Heritage Site — demands sensitivity to the craftsmanship of these buildings. The replacement of decayed or inappropriate window sashes (window framing, not curtains) is certainly expensive, but such costly repairs for landmark buildings are necessary rather than pointless.
It is disappointing that Meyer suggests that the preservation of the Lawn and Range rooms evokes feelings of a time when “segregation and gender discrimination were openly endorsed.” Such a charge could be leveled at nearly all old buildings.
Philip Herrington
GSAS III
Read More
LETTER: The Jefferson Council understates faculty criticism of the presidential search
By Jeri Seidman | 18 hours agoThat is factually inaccurate. In fact, faculty did protest.
A statement by 211 concerned faculty on the presidential and provost search committees
By Concerned Faculty | October 4, 2025As members of the faculty, we remind the Board that, at the end of the day, an academic community is an exercise in shared governance for the good of the whole.
LETTER: Embrace medicinal herb gardens on Grounds
By Jane Mattimoe | October 2, 2025I do love the gardens around the Lawn, which feature small smatterings of herbs, but something more extensive and scientific would be of great benefit to Grounds.
