In response to the proposed civility project (“New program aims to better civility code,” 3/13/2009), I would like to encourage the project’s planners to seriously examine their goals before more formally unveiling their proposal. Few would disagree that being forced off the sidewalk is an unpleasant experience, however I hope that this dialogue in civility will be extremely aware of cultural differences that exist at the University. Creating guidelines for acceptable behavior, if done without considering diverse perspectives, will only serve to alienate students who represent cultures that do not fall in line with the project’s definition of civility. Travel abroad and it is simple to see that different cultures have different appreciations for different things — and what vibrancy and discourse that can bring to the University. The value that an individual places on a behavior or custom is so utterly dependent on their background and experiences, I fear that defining civil behavior borders on imposing our own judgements and opinions on a University that is hardly homogenous. I would encourage the project’s leaders to be mindful of one of George Washington’s own rules as they progress: “Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding.”
Read More
LETTER: The Jefferson Council understates faculty criticism of the presidential search
By Jeri Seidman | 5 hours agoThat is factually inaccurate. In fact, faculty did protest.
A statement by 211 concerned faculty on the presidential and provost search committees
By Concerned Faculty | October 4, 2025As members of the faculty, we remind the Board that, at the end of the day, an academic community is an exercise in shared governance for the good of the whole.
LETTER: Embrace medicinal herb gardens on Grounds
By Jane Mattimoe | October 2, 2025I do love the gardens around the Lawn, which feature small smatterings of herbs, but something more extensive and scientific would be of great benefit to Grounds.
