In response to the proposed civility project (“New program aims to better civility code,” 3/13/2009), I would like to encourage the project’s planners to seriously examine their goals before more formally unveiling their proposal. Few would disagree that being forced off the sidewalk is an unpleasant experience, however I hope that this dialogue in civility will be extremely aware of cultural differences that exist at the University. Creating guidelines for acceptable behavior, if done without considering diverse perspectives, will only serve to alienate students who represent cultures that do not fall in line with the project’s definition of civility. Travel abroad and it is simple to see that different cultures have different appreciations for different things — and what vibrancy and discourse that can bring to the University. The value that an individual places on a behavior or custom is so utterly dependent on their background and experiences, I fear that defining civil behavior borders on imposing our own judgements and opinions on a University that is hardly homogenous. I would encourage the project’s leaders to be mindful of one of George Washington’s own rules as they progress: “Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding.”
Read More
LETTER: Misunderstanding the Honor Committee’s mental health procedures
By Seamus Oliver and Alexander Church | March 15, 2024We recognize that the Honor process can be stressful and that any student may benefit from support, regardless of an underlying health condition.
LETTER: Mischaracterizing a tangled war
By Michael Liebermann | February 2, 2024We should not address this war with blind idealism. We should address it, instead, with nuance and care.
P.U.M.P.K.I.N. SOCIETY: Happy Halloween 2023
By P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society | October 31, 2023The P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society Recognizes Individuals Who Enrich The University Community Through Their Silent And Selfless Service.
