Stephanie Waties' article on health care ("The costs of good care", Sept. 17) seemed to have good intentions; however, it was extremely biased. Students should be informed about the government health care proposals, but they should be presented the information in such a way that both sides of the argument are equally represented without bias, so that each individual can form his or her own opinion on the issue. Waties made the heath care issue seem like there was no point for anyone to debate it, and with the information provided in the article, an uninformed student might take all of it to be unbiased fact. I think that it is great that The Cavalier Daily makes an effort to cover important social and political issues, but it should strive to inform students, not brain wash them.
Mike Tesh\nSEAS III
Read More
A statement from 201 concerned faculty about U.Va. President Beardsley’s appointment
By Concerned Faculty | January 16, 2026By acting in bad faith, the Board has flouted its fiduciary duties to the University and has violated its own bylaws calling on it to protect the University from outside interference.
LETTER: When everything is labeled hazing, nothing is
By Scott Gleason | January 4, 2026Worse still, over-policing benign practices risks driving genuinely harmful behavior underground.
LETTER: An alumnus and parent’s perspective on U.Va.’s presidential search process
By Tom Neale | December 15, 2025The critiques of Mahoney and the Board of Visitors are egregious double standards that I believe are motivated by political differences with Mahoney and the Board.
