To the Editor:
The Cavalier Daily was right to argue a lecturer's criticism of Black Lives Matter was protected by the First Amendment in its Oct. 10 editorial.
Doug Muir’s criticism of BLM as supposedly being racist was protected by the First Amendment, under court rulings like Dube v. State University of New York (1990). That ruling concluded a professor had a First Amendment right to repeatedly declare that Zionism is racism. His speech was protected even though it infuriated many.
Worse speech has been held protected. In Levin v. Harleston (1992), an appeals court ruled the First Amendment protected a professor whose published "writings contained a number of denigrating comments concerning the intelligence and social characteristics of blacks."
Sincerely,
Hans Bader
CLAS ‘91
Read More
PARTING SHOT: Off the record
By Evelyn Lewis | 3 hours agoI had, and have, dreams for resources like “On Record” to start to rebuild conversations rooted in human connection.
DUTTENHOFER: Temporary residence does not absolve students of civic responsibility
By Lucy Duttenhofer | 3 days agoThe truth is that students are a central part of the Charlottesville community for four years, which means they must step up to voice their opinions, whether they want to or not.
EDITORIAL: Debate should be done the right way
By Editorial Board | April 30, 2026These events may turn out large crowds and generate TikTok clicks, but these formats are inadequate at facilitating genuine intellectual intercourse.
