The open letter sent by a portion of the University faculty to President Sullivan has spurred considerable discussion, and rightly so. Critics of this letter claim it represents a concerted effort to constrain speech on Grounds. Some go further and suggest it carries “Orwellian” overtones.
Such charges are baseless. The letter merely questions the idea that Jefferson’s words can always be relied on to generate unity during confusing or divisive times. The students I have been privileged to teach at the University understand that their school’s founder was no more infallible or omniscient than they are. I expect many can quote passages where Jefferson admits as much!
I hope your readers will be able to look past the media furor and see this disagreement between faculty and administration for what it is: a reasoned exchange of contrasting views about our University’s history and its relevance for interpreting recent political events.
Sincerely,
Paul Morrow
Lecturer, Political Philosophy, Policy and Law
Read More
EDITORIAL: HRL changes have eroded staff autonomy — again
By Editorial Board | June 8, 2025The failure to consider Resident Staff, namely SRs, as an integral stakeholder while its system falsely advertises itself as a proponent of student self-governance.
VEGA: In defense of President Jim Ryan
By Keoni Vega | June 5, 2025Should the raucous Jefferson Council and related conservative groups succeed in their effort to oust President Ryan, the University will enter a new phase that will be unrecognizable to most of its current students and staff.
EDITORIAL: U.Va. needs to promote better artificial intelligence policies
By Editorial Board | May 27, 2025A better method of controlling AI use in classrooms comes with collaboration and communication — the University should set a clear policy-making process for professors.
