Honor debates proposal to alter appeals process
By Stephanie Kassab | October 22, 2007Members at last night's Honor Committee meeting debated proposed changes in bylaws regarding appeals in the post-trial process. Submitted by the ad-hoc Committee on Procedures, the proposal seeks to simplify the appeals process and further involve non-Executive Committee members. Currently, the five-member Executive Committee, composed of the committee chair, vice chair for investigations, vice chair for education, vice chair for trials and the vice chair for community relations, decides whether there is a substantial basis for appeal. The proposal aims to change the members of the Appeal Review Committee from the five Executive Members to two executive members and three Committee members who are not part of the Executive Committee. Members of the ad-hoc Committee on Procedures said they felt this was a beneficial change that would allow "fresh eyes" on an Honor case, noting that Executive Committee members follow cases from the time they are reported to the trial. "The 'fresh eyes' idea stands out as a major point, because the Executive Committee is privy to a lot of information from previous cases," Commerce School Representative Eric Flow said.