News
By Maggie Thornton
|
October 30, 2006
The Honor Committee discussed procedural changes involving a streamlined investigation process last night.
The proposed changes include scheduling investigation panels to take place between 15 and 20 days after the start of an investigation, restructuring investigations so that the reporting witness and the accused student are interviewed twice, removing the automatic assignment of an Honor advisor to a reporting witness and creating a form outlining the necessary information about the process for involved parties.
The proposed restructuring would also include a reworking of the investigation panel hearings "ending appearance at the hearings by counsel, advisors, investigated students and reporting witnesses," according to the proposal.
The Committee's by-laws state that an investigation panel now includes a 15-minute presentation by each counsel, an opportunity for both the reporting witness and the accused student to speak and time for panel questions.
Investigation panels are composed of three Committee members who decide whether or not they will accuse a students based on the standard that "more likely than not" an honor offense was committed with dishonest intent and that the act in question was serious.
"These are not nibbles anymore," Vice Chair for Trials Jay Trickett said of the proposed changes.
Trickett said the changes will significantly alter the roles of several parties currently involved in the process.
"We want to shift the role of the reporting witness ... from that of a party in an adversarial relationship with the accused to that of a witness reporting a case," Trickett added.