News
By John McArdle
|
November 29, 2000
For the first time since the release of an in-depth report two weeks ago, members of the Honor Committee and the Honor System Review Commission formally convened to hear the general student body's candid reactions to major reform proposals to the University's 158-year-old honor system.
The proposals, intended to bring about drastic constitutional and procedural changes to the student-run honor system, drew concern and met challenges from audience members worried about what these changes would mean to the future of the system.
The Commission members, who argue that the 15 reforms - including six constitutional amendments - are necessary to "save the system before it's too late," listened to comments from about 50 students, faculty members and administrators in Minor Hall last night.
While a wide range of subjects were discussed and debated, three issues dominated the forum discussion.