A federal judge recently dismissed seven of the 10 complaints in a $1.5 million lawsuit filed against the University by suspended student Harrison Kerr Tigrett October 22, 1999.
Tigrett sued the University after he was suspended for his role in the assault of University student Alexander "Sandy" Kory on the Ruffner Footbridge on November 21, 1997.
Tigrett claimed in his lawsuit that the University violated his civil, due process and First Amendment rights when he was suspended for one full academic year and given 75 hours of community service.
Federal Judge Norman K. Moon threw out most of the lawsuit but denied the University's motion to dismiss parts of the suit regarding Tigrett's University Judiciary Committee trial in November 1998.
Moon declined to dismiss Tigrett's charge that the UJC and William W. Harmon, vice president for student affairs, violated his rights of due process during his judiciary hearing.
Tigrett alleges that Harmon told him and two of the other students involved in the assault, Richard Smith and Bradley Kintz, that the UJC trial would be postponed. Tigrett's suit claims that because of what Harmon said, the three defendants did not attend their Nov. 21, 1998 hearing because they thought it was postponed.
During the hearing the UJC found Tigrett guilty of violating Standards 1, 5 and 8 of the University's Standards of Conduct and expelled Tigrett, Kintz and Smith. Tigrett and the others appealed the decision to the Judicial Review Board because they were not present at the hearing. After the JRB and a panel assembled by Harmon reviewed the case in the spring of 1999, Tigrett's violation of Standard 5 was dropped and University President John T. Casteen III decided to suspend Tigrett for two semesters. Smith was suspended for two years and Kintz was suspended for one semester.
The Judicial Review Board denied Tigrett's appeal on June 22, 1999. He filed suit on October 22, 1999.
Smith and Kintz also have lawsuits pending against the University.
Tigrett also alleges the University did not notify him he was being charged with violating Standard 8. Kory did not initially charge Tigrett with Standard 8, which prohibits disorderly conduct. UJC procedures require that a student be provided with written notification of the charges being brought against him.
Also in his lawsuit, Tigrett claimed the University violated his First Amendment rights by sanctioning remarks he made to Kory during the incident even though he never physically hurt Kory. Smith has admitted to being the only defendant who physically struck Kory.
Moon ruled Tigrett's argument was unfounded because the Supreme Court has held that fighting words are not protected by the First Amendment. Tigrett said in his suit that he did not use fighting words, but has declined to state what he said to Kory, so Moon found his argument to be "without merit."
"Even if Kory never felt directly threatened, Tigrett's use of curse words had the effect of provoking and antagonizing another student for no apparent reason. There is no basis in constitutional law to protect that type of activity," Moon wrote in his opinion.
According to Moon's decision, Tigrett and Kintz "verbally confronted" Kory and exchanged "verbal banter, name-calling and curse words." Smith then got out of the car they were in and "attempted to calm the situation," but hit Kory in the face.
In May 1998, the Albemarle General District Court sentenced Tigrett and Kintz to eight days in jail and community service for disorderly conduct. Smith was sentenced to two months in jail on a misdemeanor assault and battery charge.
Tigrett also claimed his rights of due process were violated when a panel assembled by Harmon reviewed the case in May 1999. Smith claimed a similar violation in his lawsuit. The complaints were dismissed in Tigrett's and Smith's lawsuits.
The only defendants remaining in Tigrett's lawsuit are the UJC members who conducted the hearing and Harmon. The judge also allowed Tigrett's complaint that the Board of Visitors failed to educate the UJC on how to conduct the hearing.
Harmon declined to comment on case specifics because he is still named as a defendant in the portion of the lawsuit that was not dismissed.
The trial is set for this October, but University Associate General Counsel Richard C. Kast said the University is planning to file another motion to have the rest of the lawsuit dismissed. Kintz's and Smith's trials also are scheduled to be heard in Charlottesville Federal Court during October.
Kast said the University currently has five lawsuits pending against it involving student disciplinary measures. Besides Tigrett, Smith and Kintz, Jonathan Cobb sued the University for $1.05 million Nov. 30, 1999 after he was expelled from the University for cheating on an ECON 371 exam in the spring of 1997. Former University student Maurice Guillaume Goodreau III filed a $1.75 million lawsuit in Oct., 1999 after the Honor Committee revoked his degree eight years after he graduated for misusing Karate Club funds.
Read More
Health System Board discusses two recent $25 million donations
By Nina Broderick | YesterdayThe Board also discussed the goals and vision of the Paul and Diane Manning Institute of Biotechnology and voted to approve the fiscal year 2026 operating budget.
Honor Committee discusses fall Support Officer recruitment
By Bertie Azqueta | 2 days agoThe Support Officer pool is chosen by existing Senior Support Officers and the Selection and Recruitment Committee members through an application and interview process.
Previewing the June meeting of the Board of Visitors
By Cecilia Mould | 5 days agoBefore the full Board meets, members of each Committee will convene in separate meetings to discuss business and vote on action items Thursday and Friday.
