LAST THURSDAY, students and administrators proudly unveiled the long-awaited "diversity center" which replaced the informal lounge in Newcomb Hall and christened it"Kaleidoscope: Center for Cultural Fluency." Officials and boosters announced hopes that the "new and different" space will provoke new and different discussion of culture and race that will lead to greater understanding and unity. Let's hope they're right -- because the current atmosphere at the University, fueled by a multitude of well-meaning but divisive programs and individuals, lends itself to censorship, intimidation and faction-forming rather than unity and free discourse.
The name Kaleidoscope itself is not encouraging, but will hopefully prove contradictory. When you look through a kaleidoscope you view not the unfettered potential of a free and fair world, but instead a landscape fractured by superimposed color and a distorted lens. We can only assume this is not what the Cultural Fluency Center promotes.
Advocates of "diversity" -- based reform often argue that the world currently exists in a fractured state, and that a major part of our problem is that we do not recognize it. Thus they want to show the sheltered masses the light. Perhaps this was the motivation behind the center's new name.
Indeed, revealing existing differences in culture and creed should be a part of any reform effort -
Read More
TAYLOR: The slush fund’s defeat is a reminder that our damaged institutions still function
By Nat Taylor | 19 hours agoIt is worth celebrating this momentary triumph, if only to inspire confidence in our democracy again.
CARON: Legal does not mean accessible for reproductive rights in Virginia
By Jenna Caron | YesterdayVirginians must affirm the VRRFA by voting it into the Constitution of Virginia and encourage their representatives to pursue consistent accessibility.
COHEN: The Honor Committee should rethink its approach to punishment
By Ryan Cohen | 3 days agoIf accountability is to remain at the heart of honor, then consequences must do more than educate — they must also reflect the seriousness of the violations committed.
