Matt Conover's article (Wednesday) regarding the tailgate procedures for the Lawn and Range gives half (or less) of the whole story and smears people who have worked tirelessly to permit students to engage in activities which the University is completely within their rights to prohibit. As a resident of the Range, I wish - just like anyone else who lives here - that we didn't have to worry about how many people we invited or how we were going to get our wristbands back, but the fact is that the Head Resident of the Lawn and Dean of Students have been bending over backwards to let us host these parties extending outside of our rooms and into a historic, fragile, and protected space. Having friends over to our room is our right as residents and rent-payers. Hosting 40, much less an entire CIO or Greek organization, on the other hand, is certainly not included in our rights. We are lucky to have that privilege.
Read More
A statement from 181 concerned faculty on the Faculty Senate’s Nov. 14 resolution
By Concerned Faculty | November 24, 2025Continuing the search now would be all the proof needed to conclude that the Board and Mahoney are acting not in the University’s best interests but pursuant to some other agenda, if further proof were needed.
P.U.M.P.K.I.N. SOCIETY: Happy Halloween 2025
By P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society | October 31, 2025We Would Like To Recognize The Volunteers, Pavilion Residents And Residents Of The Lawn And Range For Their Efforts To Ensure A Safe And Fun Trick-Or-Treating On The Lawn Event This Year
LETTER: The Jefferson Council understates faculty criticism of the presidential search
By Jeri Seidman | October 23, 2025That is factually inaccurate. In fact, faculty did protest.
