I found the lead editorial from March 4 ("Leading the Pack") to be a bit misleading in nature. The editorial wishes to endorse a specific candidate for the office of Chair of the Judiciary and Honor Committees, but the editors failed to speak with all representatives who have been elected (only speaking to those from some of the more contested representative races). It is also important to note that elections for the Curry School were not yet complete, and The Cavalier Daily's attempt to support a specific candidate is extremely premature from a time perspective. To think that The Cavalier Daily did not take the time needed to speak with all representatives is very disheartening, considering that The Cavalier Daily is supposed to be a source of factually accurate and detailed information. I sincerely hope that The Cavalier Daily better handles these sorts of nuances in the future, and perhaps it may be best to refrain from publicly supporting any candidate.
Michael Chapman\nCurry Graduate Student\nUJC Chair '09-10
Read More
OPINIONS: How U.Va. should respond to the changing artificial intelligence landscape
By Ishaan Satija , Miles Dyckoff , Scarlett Sullivan and Zehra Hasnain | 2 days agoFour opinion columnists write about how students, departments and the University administration could transform their relationship with AI
DUTTENHOFER: A case for 287(g) agreements
By Lucy Duttenhofer | 4 days agoICE is not going away. 287(g) agreements are not, either. Understanding and using them effectively must be a priority.
YOUNIS: University networks protect rapists
By Ayat Younis | 6 days agoWhen a university's response to sexual violence is limited, who is the institution actually protecting?
