Ginny Robinson, in "Majority rules" (Sept. 20), successfully turned a rather common-sense Supreme Court case into a horror story complete with the extermination of Christianity and the arrival of the newest contracted independent organization on Grounds: "Hoo's in the Mob." The case in question, Hastings v. Martinez, concerns the nondiscrimination policy for student organizations at Hastings College of Law. From Robinson's account, it seems as though a student organization at Hastings was either an official club or an underground gang. That is simply not the case. At Hastings, student groups may either be a Registered Student Organization (RSO), thereby gaining school funding, or be unregistered and exist just fine, as do fraternities and special-interest groups. In order to be an RSO however, the group cannot discriminate against one's religion, sexual orientation, etc. The question: Can the Christian Legal Society (CSL) still discriminate on those grounds and become an RSO? The answer from the Supreme Court: No.
While CSL, a nationwide organization for lawyers with Christian values, is welcome to exist at Hastings, it can't be expected to be an RSO while prohibiting its members from "unrepentant participation in or advocacy of a sexually immoral lifestyle." Looks like gay students can't join the club. Conveniently, Robinson failed to mention that the financial assistance that RSO's receive comes from a fee that all students pay. If a group wants to be more selective about its membership, that's fine - the group can join the Greek organizations and the political groups in the unregistered category. Discriminate away, just don't expect the student body to pay for the pizza parties.
Logan McClellan\nCLAS IV
Read More
JEFFERSON COUNCIL: The hypocritical politicization of U.Va.’s presidential search
By Jefferson Council | October 12, 2025The current presidential search committee includes 28 members — Board members, students, administrators, alumni and faculty — with at least as many faculty as the previous two. Given its composition, concerns about representation are unfounded.
RASHID: U.Va.’s new privacy policy should be welcomed — and expanded
By Muhammad Ali Rashid | October 12, 2025Privacy is not merely a technical shield against data leaks or hacks — it is a baseline human right that shapes how students learn, organize and speak.
KING: The College Republicans’ letter to the Board dishonors the University
By Michael King | October 11, 2025With their calls for administrative consequences, the CRs thumb their noses at the Jeffersonian principles of free speech that this University was founded to defend.
