THERE is no question about it. Ask any law student and you will get the same answer: one course, LAW 7071, Professional Responsibility, is the pesky requirement. It is a bee buzzing in our ears. Although the Law School has relatively few required courses, our ethics course is an unmovable rock.
I have got to admit that when I signed up for the course, I did so with more than a pinch of cynicism. I was wrong: After taking Professional Responsibility, I simply cannot imagine a curriculum which does not have a required class in ethics.
Given the scandals which regularly grace headlines, the need for an ethics course is perhaps more acute for practice in law, medicine or business. For example, the legal profession has a Code of Professional Responsibility detailing the standards of ethical conduct that all lawyers are expected to follow. Indeed, as Prof. Richard Balnave, one of the main professors of Professional Responsibility at the Law School, has pointed out, "Some of the rules of legal ethics are easy to understand because they mirror rules of ethics that apply throughout society, such as the general rule that it is wrong to lie or deceive. No special classes would be needed to understand these types of rules. However, there are other rules of legal ethics that are not readily understood because they arise from the special roles that lawyers are assigned in our adversary system of justice
Read More
CLIPPINGER: Take a Women, Gender & Sexuality Course at U.Va.
By Grace Clippinger | YesterdayFar from a mere ideology, gender studies provides a critical framework for engaging with a variety of real-world issues.
DUTTENHOFER: Higher education should not reset every four years
By Lucy Duttenhofer | 2 days agoA growing pattern of political interference and upheaval is quietly destabilizing the foundations of both academia and the University itself.
WETMORE: A justification for Gov. Spanberger’s appointments
By Celeste Wetmore | 3 days agoThe Board continued their search without pause in the face of these checks on their operations, demonstrating the detachment of its agenda from community wishes and concerns — and providing clear justification for Spanberger’s actions.
