I most heartily agree with Katherine Ripley's Jan. 19 column about the establishment of religion, titled "(Ripley's) Believe it or not." There is no way the Founders would have ever allowed any elected official to make any political decisions based on religious conviction.
Can you imagine the chaos that would have ensued if the people who wrote the Constitution had believed that political decisions could be made based on a religious belief in rights given to them by "Nature's God" or a "Creator"? Why, they might have even declared independence from Great Britain! Fortunately, none of these people believed there might be a difference between establishing a specific religious organization as a state religion and making decisions based on religious conviction.
And it is a good thing, too! You might have had extremist Christians running around saying things like, "Our reliance is in the love of liberty which God has planted in our bosoms" while opposing slavery! Oh, Abraham Lincoln did that. Maybe it is a good thing that religious conviction has strongly impacted political decisions in the past, and maybe that trend should continue.
Michael Watson\nCLAS IV
Read More
CARON: Do not blame universities for gun violence
By Jenna Caron | 1 hours agoWhile accountability in response to the failure of safety systems is necessary, these investigations portray gun violence at universities as a procedural misstep rather than an institutional failure on the part of the federal government.
EDITORIAL: U.Va. must steady the ship against tidal waves of uncertainty
By Editorial Board | YesterdayThe community must acknowledge the flaws of this Board transformation in order to hold future governors accountable
OLIVER: Where are our standards?
By Seamus Oliver | 2 days agoEven those critical of the process that appointed him have admitted Beardsley’s considerable fundraising ability, but does he check any other box?
