In the letter, Spanberger urged the Board to hold off on selecting finalists in the search and not to appoint a president until she has filled five current vacancies.
While both the rejected Compact and the Justice Department agreement faced resistance from the University community and have several similarities, the agreement provides firmer protection for academic freedom.
“The important question, therefore, is whether following the DOJ guidance imposes substantial burdens on U.Va.,” Mahoney wrote. “The answer is clearly no.”
The guidance outlines the key federal antidiscrimination laws which it is based on, as well as examples of unlawful and potentially unlawful practices.
To get a more complete account of what took place, The Cavalier Daily reviewed court transcripts and other documents in addition to speaking to four residents of the house where the alleged incidents took place.
The eight-page letter expressed concern that the agreement is unconstitutional and asked Mahoney and Sheridan to “reconsider” the deal.
University leaders defended their deal with the Justice Department in a new letter sent to Charlottesville’s legislators Monday, arguing that it is a better deal than other universities have made and that it does not threaten the University’s autonomy.
"Our work does go unappreciated. We’re on call 24/7, [during] the holiday, in the middle of the night."
A few senators raised concerns about the potential impact of the agreement on admissions, the search for the next president and the heightened level of scrutiny it would create.
Here is a look at the decisions peer institutions have made, and the status of the University’s decision.
Although the University ultimately chose not to sign an agreement from the Trump administration, Interim University President Paul Mahoney left open the possibility of future collaboration and alternative approaches in his letter to the Education Department.
Prior to Mahoney’s rejection Friday, Tyler Coward, lead counsel of Government Affairs at FIRE and attorney, noted his specific concern with some language of the Compact.
The University has rejected the “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” which he received from the White House and Department of Education Oct. 1, according to a community statement released Friday evening by Interim University President Paul Mahoney.
The alleged racketeering scheme, coined the “Kent Enterprise” in the suit, alleges that Kent and other named doctors prioritized revenue and ranking over patient safety.
Throughout the year, the University has faced a variety of legal challenges, including seven investigations by the Justice Department — two of which have now closed — and a lawsuit by Virginia Senate Democrats over Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s appointments to the Board of Visitors.
The search committee is composed of 26 members, all of whom have connections to the University — although it was composed of 28 before two Youngkin Board of Visitors appointees were blocked by state Senate Democrats.
Brown University became the second of nine universities to reject the Trump administration’s “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” Wednesday, following the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s similar decision last week.
The compact contains ten points, eight of which detailed policy areas of the University that were prioritized by the federal government.
These new vehicles reflect a push towards a more sustainable, cost-effective and adaptable transportation option for students to get around Grounds.
Several faculty have expressed concern over the mere existence of the Compact, claiming that it demonstrates extreme federal overreach from the Trump administration.
