Honor debates referendum implications
By Margaret Bonner | February 28, 2005At last night's meeting, the Honor Committee discussed the issue and implications of the consensus clause, a referendum on the spring ballot. The consensus clause is an amendment to the Honor constitution which specifies that any changes to the sanctioning power of the Committee be approved by a majority of the student body. The consensus clause was placed on the ballot through a student petition and consequently was not addressed by the Committee. "The Committee doesn't have a specific opinion either way," Honor Committee Chair Meghan Sullivan said. Most members of the Committee agreed that education about the consensus clause had been adequate. "We've tried our best to ensure that our educators know how to explain what it is and what it means to vote for or against it," Sullivan said. Sullivan opened the floor for representatives to discuss questions that have come up on this issue from their constituents. "The consensus is definitely that it's fairly transparent, that it's not about consensus -- it's about the single sanction," Committee Secretary Elisabeth Epps said.


