I am responding to an article in The Cavalier Daily arguing against affirmative action by Annette Robertson (“Reverse discrimination,” Oct. 3). I thought it was well done, and I applaud the author for it. However, I was surprised that she did not mention another more intuitive reason why affirmative action is illogical: It would be unfair to alter an applicant’s chances of admission based on a physical characteristic over which he or she has no control. Consider this: Would it be fair to help or hinder an applicant because he was born ugly or beautiful? Or because he was born with a certain eye color? Somehow, I doubt it. Nobody chooses to be born with those types of arbitrary (relative to admission) physical characteristics that have no relation to merit. Likewise, I submit that it would be inconsistent and irrational to enhance or detract from someone’s chances of admission because he was born into a certain race.
Byron Cheon
CLAS II
Read More
A statement from 191 concerned faculty to the new Board of Visitors
By Concerned Faculty | February 20, 2026Critical questions of process regarding the appointment of Beardsley remain unanswered.
A statement from 201 concerned faculty about U.Va. President Beardsley’s appointment
By Concerned Faculty | January 16, 2026By acting in bad faith, the Board has flouted its fiduciary duties to the University and has violated its own bylaws calling on it to protect the University from outside interference.
LETTER: When everything is labeled hazing, nothing is
By Scott Gleason | January 4, 2026Worse still, over-policing benign practices risks driving genuinely harmful behavior underground.
