Mr. Hess’ column (2/4/09, “More sanctions, more problems”) errs by claiming that “a multiple sanction system vitiates [the importance of honor] by diluting the clarity of that message.” On the contrary, the present set of punishments imposed under the honor code – namely, the single sanction of expulsion from the University – is the one actually “diluting” the importance of honor within our community.
In particular, we have established a one-size-fits-all and permanent “solution” for only the most grievous of offenses while ignoring “trivial” acts of dishonor, effectively sending a message to the University community – as well as the Charlottesville and Albemarle community, more generally – that honor only matters when the act is judged as “non-trivial.” If Mr. Hess truly wants the system to be “fair,” he should consider supporting a multiple sanction system in which the punishment fits the crime.
Read More
A statement from 201 concerned faculty about U.Va. President Beardsley’s appointment
By Concerned Faculty | January 16, 2026By acting in bad faith, the Board has flouted its fiduciary duties to the University and has violated its own bylaws calling on it to protect the University from outside interference.
LETTER: When everything is labeled hazing, nothing is
By Scott Gleason | January 4, 2026Worse still, over-policing benign practices risks driving genuinely harmful behavior underground.
LETTER: An alumnus and parent’s perspective on U.Va.’s presidential search process
By Tom Neale | December 15, 2025The critiques of Mahoney and the Board of Visitors are egregious double standards that I believe are motivated by political differences with Mahoney and the Board.
