Mr. Hess’ column (2/4/09, “More sanctions, more problems”) errs by claiming that “a multiple sanction system vitiates [the importance of honor] by diluting the clarity of that message.” On the contrary, the present set of punishments imposed under the honor code – namely, the single sanction of expulsion from the University – is the one actually “diluting” the importance of honor within our community.
In particular, we have established a one-size-fits-all and permanent “solution” for only the most grievous of offenses while ignoring “trivial” acts of dishonor, effectively sending a message to the University community – as well as the Charlottesville and Albemarle community, more generally – that honor only matters when the act is judged as “non-trivial.” If Mr. Hess truly wants the system to be “fair,” he should consider supporting a multiple sanction system in which the punishment fits the crime.
Read More
LETTER: The Jefferson Council understates faculty criticism of the presidential search
By Jeri Seidman | 11 hours agoThat is factually inaccurate. In fact, faculty did protest.
A statement by 211 concerned faculty on the presidential and provost search committees
By Concerned Faculty | October 4, 2025As members of the faculty, we remind the Board that, at the end of the day, an academic community is an exercise in shared governance for the good of the whole.
LETTER: Embrace medicinal herb gardens on Grounds
By Jane Mattimoe | October 2, 2025I do love the gardens around the Lawn, which feature small smatterings of herbs, but something more extensive and scientific would be of great benefit to Grounds.
