The Cavalier Daily
Serving the University Community Since 1890

Committee discusses jury processes

Proposals would provide juries with interrogatory questions, redefine intent, modify student jury make-up

Estimated reading time: 0 minutes

The Honor Committee debated three aspects of how juries in honor trials deliberate at last night's meeting, as it works to improve the trial process and maintain healthier relations with the University community.

Committee Chair Charles Harris said the majority of the debate centered on proposals to increase, clarify and direct jury participation.

The first proposal, put forth by Law School representative Barlow Mann, involved presenting jurors with a list of specific questions to direct their deliberations and help them render a more objective verdict. Barlow explained that a unique set of brief interrogatory questions would be created for each case as a new step in pre-trial preparation. The questions would be crafted to help the jury determine act, intent and triviality

Local Savings

Puzzles
Hoos Spelling

Latest Podcast

As this year’s newest Meriwether Lewis fellows wrap up their summer session, Julie Caruccio, a MLI director and assistant vice president for research on the student experience, discusses the goals of the fellowship. Caruccio shares the history of the program and how it has evolved to continue to fit students' needs and expectations. Additionally, she describes the cohort’s summer project, where they were tasked with finding ways to build connectivity and foster relationships between people in various areas across Grounds.