News
By Margaret Bonner
|
February 22, 2006
Honor Committee candidates squared off last night in a debate sponsored by the University Board of Elections.
Candidates from the College of Arts & Sciences and the School of Engineering fielded questions on issues ranging from the consensus clause to the role of the trial chair in consistent outcomes.
The College candidates who attended the debate were third-year counsel A-J Aronstein, third-year counsel Brendan Connors, second-year advisor Ben Cooper, third-year senior educator Kendall Fox, third-year counsel Sam Leven, second-year advisor Brian O'Neill and third-year senior advisor Andrew Siegel.
Of the seven candidates, only O'Neill supported the consensus clause referendum, which would raise the voting turnout requirements for changes to the single sanction.
"It's not because I think the single sanction should be impossible to change," O'Neill said.