News
By Margaret Bonner
|
April 4, 2005
The outgoing Honor Committee released case statistics for its yearlong term last night, among them the fact that 40 percent of this year's cases were initiated by students.
Student initiation rates showed a marked increase for this term.
"It was closer to 12 percent last year," Special Assistant to the Honor Committee Nicole Eramo said.
Approximately 32 percent of this year's cases were initiated by faculty members, 25 percent by TAs and four percent by administrators.
"Faculty and TAs are in a unique position to discover honor violations and therefore have a naturally higher initiation rate," outgoing Vice chair for Trials Nick Staubach said.
The increase in student initiations can be attributed to ongoing efforts on the part of the Committee for several years, newly elected Honor chair David Hobbs said.
"Increasing student initiations has been a goal of the committee over the past few years," Hobbs said.
The rise in student initiations comes as good news to the newly elected Honor Executive Committee, which has listed increasing student initiation rates among their major concerns for their upcoming term, the members of the Committee noted.
These and other statistics were presented to and discussed by the outgoing Committee at last night's meeting.
The statistics break down the results of investigations, post-investigation panels, trials and post-trial.
They also list the attributes of defendants by race, gender, school, athletic status, international student status and offense.
Defendant statistics, especially race and international student status are especially important in the Committee's ongoing investigation of the so-called "spotlighting" of minority groups and the "dimming" of majority groups.
Prior years' numbers have shown that minority and international students have cases initiated against them at much higher rates proportional to majority.
Of the 64 investigations carried on by the Committee this year, 28 went to trial, and 10 of those trials had guilty verdicts, a conviction rate of about 36 percent.
The Honor Committee remarked that the investigation and trial statistics are also very useful to the Honor Committee in determining trends and anomalies.
Representative Marisa Adelman pointed out that only cheating trials had guilty verdicts this year and all six combined lying and stealing defendants were found not guilty.
Eramo said this was fairly typical compared to the statistics of previous years.