The University must restoratively respond to these failures, locating tangible solutions to a system that continues to mistreat and undervalue the graduate student community.
We should leave behind traditional shelters in favor of more beneficial long-term housing.
The simple fact is that living on the Lawn is supposed to be a privilege but increasingly seems to be an inconvenience.
College students encounter two forms of price discrimination — large discrepancies between in-state and out-of-state tuition and misleading sticker prices.
Instead of recognizing Alderman for the damage he did, the new library buries the truth by perverting his legacy into something worth memorializing.
To remove Alderman’s name and remembrance would be to bury the shameful aspects of our past, which we should instead recognize and learn from.
The Editorial Board believes that, collectively, this ticket will be able to uphold the mission of Student Council.
Voting no on Referendum 1 is a vote in favor of finding sustainable peace for everyone.
We demand the right to understand and assess where the University is investing its money.
Multi-sanction has the potential to redefine what constitutes a sanction, and the Editorial Board believes that this potential has yet to be fully realized.
The Editorial Board is confident in these candidates’ abilities to help UJC promote safety, respect and freedom.
These candidates, while emphatically pragmatic and solution-oriented, embody the creative and realistic outlook necessary to actualize their goals and support students.
More than putting a burden on students, current CHI procedures, in fact, fail to ensure that all accused students who are affected by a mental health disorder receive proper consideration.
The University should change their current policy in order to allow students to bring pepper spray to all University sanctioned events.
Asking students to wait this long to have certainty about their summer plans is not only inconvenient, it actively preselects a certain group of affluent students.
In reality, however, the University’s invitation for students to share their connection to this institution is simply further proof of how the status of legacy admissions continue to stain our institution.
Since the appointment of a City Manager is a step away from representative democracy, we risk our governance becoming both ignorant to the issues of the voters and unaccountable to their sentiments.
We should not address this war with blind idealism. We should address it, instead, with nuance and care.
When compared with the benefits of investing in affordable housing, the grievances in this lawsuit are little more than the prioritization of small town aesthetics over quality of life.
School is not just for those already studious and successful, and dedication is not just for those hard-working and helpful.
