Opinion
By Daniel Colbert
|
February 17, 2006
ON THURSDAY, the University Judiciary Committee voted on a proposal to submit a referendum to the student body creating harsher sanctions for violations of the Standards of Conduct "motivated by the age, color, disability, national or ethnic origin, political affiliation, race, religion, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation or veteran status of the victim." This proposal, though well-intentioned, is more dangerous than it is useful because it poses a threat to individual liberties and has little chance for success in decreasing such incidents.
The most obvious difficulty with the idea is that it is difficult to ascertain the true motives behind a hate incident.