We are announcing our return to giving historical tours independent of the University administration.
Religiously-oriented education is one of the most obvious manifestations of this regional specificity and one of the greatest drivers of censorship.
Youngkin is trying to entice data centers to move to Northern Virginia for his own political gain, and presenting this to the taxpayer as a service to the citizen is deceiving.
In its current situation, Charlottesville is an early adopter of the upzoning movement, giving the City the unique opportunity to act as a shining example of its benefits.
We need to reconsider how we think about extracurriculars — this hyper-competitive and exclusive culture which implicitly frames clubs as resume-padders must be stopped.
Until these bureaucracies have proven willing to commit to change outright, it is up to us, students and Charlottesville residents, to continue pushing for that change.
The University must take steps to provide its students with the means to easily navigate the resources, offices and structures of the institution.
Such appointments being dictated by connections and donations creates a Board composed of big donors instead of members passionate about University goals.
A large driver of this inequality comes in the form of collectives, the structures many schools use to organize their NIL payments.
The University appears committed to a future defined by data, but lacks the dedication to meeting this future’s energy needs in a sustainable way.
Youngkin once again abandoned his duty to protect Virginian voters’ rights, setting a dangerous precedent for elections.
To endorse, or not to endorse, that was the question.
Flipped class models fail to organize learning into these defined stages, instead overwhelming students with a large volume of content in a short span of time.
Do substandard Congressional candidates in Charlottesville and across the nation deserve our vote whilst delegitimizing the voting system?
Virginia voters have the power to reject hollow rhetoric and demand candidates who prioritize meaningful change over soundbites.
This Year, The P.U.M.P.K.I.N. Society Has Chosen To Recognize 10 Fourth-Year Students Who Have Gone Above And Beyond For Their Communities.
The FIRE statistics indicate that the University is home to self-censorship and intolerance of controversial speech.
UBE governs the main democratic avenue through which student candidates and voters can express their unique concerns about the University.
The issue is that it seems as though the University cannot walk and chew gum at the same time.
This change is a blatant way to identify struggling schools to parents and legislators, allowing both groups to avoid them like the plague.
