Banner

Protesters face internal conflict

Occupy Charlottesville expels member following disagreements about group’s direction, ideologies

Despite the departure Saturday of a self-proclaimed "key" member of Occupy Charlottesville who says the movement is in a "downward spiral that will only end badly," Occupiers in Lee Park maintain that the group is still strong.

Members of Occupy Charlottesville voted Evan Knappenberger, an Albemarle High School graduate and Iraq War veteran, out of the group Saturday after he left Lee Park as a result of significant disagreements with other Occupiers about the direction of the group. On the day of his dismissal, Knappenberger released a statement saying Occupy Charlottesville was breaking up into "radical sub-elements." He said "many of the mature people" have left the group, adding that he witnessed a "steady exodus" during the past two weeks.

Current Occupiers dismiss Knappenberger's claims about the group's internal struggles.

The ouster comes on the heels of a Daily Progress article in which Knappenberger speculated that the movement would divide into two different sub-groups with competing ideologies. The article served as a catalyst for the brewing controversy among the Occupy Charlottesville members.

Occupy Charlottesville, the local faction of a now-international movement against corporate greed, which began with Occupy Wall Street in New York City, has been camped out in Lee Park for about a month.

"The general tone of fear and mistrust is so high, [others in the Occupy movement] are talking about snitches and moles," Knappenberger said in the statement. "They are playing around with unusual definitions of 'self-defense' and 'non-violence' ... they have lost sight of their own values and even their consensus process. The revolution has begun eating its own babies."

Megan Renfro, a fourth-year College student and group member, said Occupy Charlottesville dismissed Knappenberger once his actions began to conflict with the group's main purpose and core beliefs.

"We have requested that he no longer participates in our group," Renfro said. "[He was dismissed] due to the fact that he has not adhered to these core principles of respect and non-violence."

Knappenberger, meanwhile, claims that the movement is deteriorating and the people within it have abandoned the core beliefs of the Occupy movement, including non-violence. During the past week, he said, a small section of the group held a private meeting and decided they no longer wished to remain completely non-violent.

"It was supposed to be an open movement that was inclusive of people and [it has] really changed," he said in an interview. "Now it's being secretive and it's using tactics that will alienate people ... It's more of a front for people with agendas."

Current members of the Occupy movement disagreed strongly with Knappenberger's comments, saying they had not given up on core values. They contend Knappenberger had put the group in danger of being disbanded.

"I know that what he's saying is made-up," Occupier Brent Palmer said. "He was telling things about us that were dangerous and not true to the police."

Knappenberger painted a picture of himself as the victim of a movement quickly degenerating into more of a disorganized and factious group than a peaceful and sustainable protest.

"They're not bad people; they're just really misinformed," he said. "They're inexperienced activists. They don't know that real activism is building bridges."

Knappenberger added that he was doing his best to build up the movement and get the Occupy message out, but others in the group were not cooperative in his efforts.

"They called me a snitch because I was talking to the police," he said. "Several of them have [a] lengthy history of problems with the police in general, problems with authority. They unfortunately bring that to the group."

Palmer acknowledged that he grew to like and trust Knappenberger during the month of the occupation of Lee Park, but ultimately decided that Knappenberger had put the group in danger.

"There has been a great deal of dissatisfaction in the meetings with the things Evan has been doing," Palmer said.

Knappenberger, who referred to himself as a "key member" of the Occupy Charlottesville group, highlighted the work he put into the movement.

"I personally did a lot of groundwork," Knappenberger said. "I spent a lot of time talking to the police. I asked the city council for permission to stay there before we had a permit. A lot of that groundwork went unnoticed."

Knappenberger noted a rising number of "radical feminists," among others, who were diverting the movement from its main objective. "Their interpretation of the way things are going is that when you're victimized your movement will grow," he said.

Occupier Luis Oyola said Knappenberger had raised some alarm among several Occupiers through his interactions with certain, mostly female, members of the group.

"Behind the scenes through texts he would harass people," Oyola said. "I do not consider that to be a non-violent act."

Knappenberger thinks the protest will eventually end in arrest rather than success.

They're losing legitimacy; they're losing public support," he said. "I think it's going to end with a group of people who are going to get arrested and end up doing community service."

Current members of the Occupy group say they plan to remain in Lee Park even after their current permit expires on Thanksgiving Day.

"The biggest chunk of people here are planning on staying after the permit [expires]," Oyola said. "We have different plans, but ... I would say with or without [the permit]" people will stay.

-Kaz Komolafe contributed with reporting


Published November 14, 2011 in News

Subscribe to our email edition

Get The Cavalier Daily delivered to your inbox every morning.

Subscribe now!


Calendar:


  • No events for today

  • No events for tomorrow

  • No events for Fri


Popular


  • DarrinJWard said:

    "They remind us that wealth does not guarantee immunity from criticism." That's a joke, right? Have you seen the hyperinflated criticism and hyperbole ...
    on The Cavalier Daily :: Trading blows

  • JB said:

    Somebody made Jone's stupid comments into a video. http://youtu.be/qSPNGcswPxA
    on The Cavalier Daily :: Trading blows

  • Paul Revere said:

    All women? Or some women? Given a new focus or a new distraction any person is subject to losing focus OR changing their focus/goal. Men can be just ...
    on The Cavalier Daily :: Trading blows

  • Guest said:

    "Careers in emergency medicine or high-stakes diplomacy are likely as stressful, if not more, than macro trading" Lol...
    on The Cavalier Daily :: Trading blows

  • Drew Harper said:

    Does anyone care whether this kid went to CS 110? We actually had a quarterback who could make us competitive for the first time in about 5 years...
    on Phillip Sims removed from Virginia roster


Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

EvanK
(11/14/11 11:32am)
Report
Comment

Yeah, if you watch the youtube video of last week's ga's, it becomes pretty obvious. The whole idea of activism by victimization is the only real core value of the anarchists and feminists in Lee park.

Since the police weren't victimizing anyone (mostly because I was keeping open dialogue with them) and the city wasn't victimizing anyone (again, because of behind-the-scenes work) the wanna-be victims turned on the obvious target: the veteran with a history of dealing with violence, and who just so happens to disagree with their ideologies.

If you watch the videos, the claim is made that I made several "women" feel unsafe. This is based on the fact that I was interfacing with the police in order to keep the camp safe, and that those same women were refusing to reiterate nonviolence in a secret meeting that was being held. So in their reasoning, by telling the police exactly what was happening (that some people were starting to back down from the stance of complete nonviolence), I was putting them in danger.

These women wear their beards in the same way that neonazis shave their heads- as an open challenge, a dare, to any and all just say something. The second night we were camped out in Lee park, the same women who claimed that I she was scared of me took it upon herself to correct the patriarchy of the entire culture, in the form of heaping abuse on a drunk bum who commented on her beard. When I came to his defense, this lady screamed and cursed in my face. Now she is claiming to be afraid of me.

I put it to the public that these kids don't know the first thing about activism, except what they've read out of Dworkin, or the new Anarchist cookbook (which has a chapter glamorizing prison, a chapter debunking psychiatry, and a chapter about polyamory by the way). When they look back over the civil righs, womens lib, and Indian autonomy movements, all they see is a simple chain of cause and effect: bad guys beat good guys, good guys cry in public, more good guys show up. This simplified view of a highly complex process of decades of painstaking work- building bridges, educating masses, building nonviolent discipline- is dangerous.

I put it to you as an experienced activist, and as a veteran who has taken a vow of nonviolence, that these kids are just trying to get victimized, because they want easy social change without the requisite educating, meeting, convincing, negotiating and conceptualizing.

Occupy Cville is no longer an expression of the community will for change. It is a front for anarchists and feminists and others to hide behind, while pushing their agendas. As further evidence of this, I will point out that no longer are they teaching math (I was actually) and writing, but they are having "womens caucus" "colored caucus" and talks on the anarchist dogma.

Occupy Cville has ceased to exist as it was. Farewell, cooperation. Hello conflict.


Zac
(11/14/11 12:13pm)
Report
Comment

Not only is there quite a lot of untruthful things in this article, it disseminates the fantasy of one individual who is dealing with some real serious personal issues. I'd expect more from a UVa student to report the truth and not the gossip. There are a hundred or so respectable activist working on behalf of Occupy Charlottesville and in the name of social and economic justice. This article is tainted with Yellow. It's what happens when the person writing the article clearly doesn't spend much time on it.

It's not okay to just quote one person and base an entire article on that one person, when it is clear that it is the illegitimate reality of one trouble soul. I thought the Press should adhere to responsible journalism and not portray a concocted diatribe. I guess if I want attention too, I'Il release my own press release where I make up anything I want and the press just reports it.

Very disappointed


Sean
(11/14/11 12:53pm)
Report
Comment

Zac, you are obviously quite unfamiliar with the Cav Daily this year. \nThat being said, I've stopped by Lee Park twice. Once two weeks ago, and yesterday. I have some frineds involved in it who are intelligent, kind souls trying to make a positive difference on some specific issues. I noticed that there are less of them, and much more of a homeless emcampment used as a place to get drunk and high all day. The elections were a week ago, and it's about to get very cold. Time to clear the park, and get the homeless back into heated shelters.


EvanK
(11/14/11 5:21pm)
Report
Comment

Zac,

Let's step back for a moment and stop calling people troubled. What exactly is untrue? I'm leaving in a few days, and not afraid to speak the troof. Did you watch the video of the way I was run out of camp?

It took Sara Ashley and Megan three days of hype and building fear to "get rid" of me. (BTW, I left the movement before they asked me to leave.) First they claimed that they were scared that I was lying to the police. Then they claimed that I was scaring them personally. I was not allowed to defend myself, barely even to speak a few sentences on my own behalf. Why? Because my public accusations hit close to home.

In a few months when this is all over and the radical feminists are doing their jailtime and paying their fines, we will all look back on this as a shameful development. I didn't sow the dissension and mistrust. I just exposed it to the public view.


Meri
(01/13/12 11:50pm)
Report
Comment

The Occupy in my city is also going through some difficulty. I've suggested setting up an Empathy Tent there. What is an Empathy Tent? Well, it is a tent devoted to cultivating empathy and compassion, a place in which people learn to communicate better with and understand each other better. The theory is that in our society we've been conditioned to be dog-eat-dog. We've forgotten how to talk to each other directly and how to live together peaceably. But we can learn! I proposed that the tent include: a listener (one who volunteers to listen to whomever needs an ear), a restorative justice group (this is non-violent conflict resolution), empathy groups (classes on how to develop empathy and compassion for others, lectures, self-help support groups, group therapy for activists--being an activist is stressful, alcoholics anonymous sessions could also meet), yoga and meditation sessions. The Empathy tent could also be a quiet, relaxing place where people could just go to pray or meditate. Representatives from various religious groups (priests, ministers, rabbis, Buddhist monks, etc.) could volunteer to speak or pray with people.

Check out Edwin Rutsch on FB. His web site is cultureofempathy.com He set up an empathy group at Occupy Oakland.



Powered by powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News