While I don’t agree with the Westboro Baptist Church, I’d just like to make public an observation that I think many have had in private but might be reluctant to share. It’s no secret that many Christians disagree with the practice of homosexuality, and it is also well-known that chapels are sites of Christian worship. While the University Chapel has become more of a public monument than a place of worship, many still consider it offensive, not that homosexuals are present there, but more so that they hold functions in recognition and acceptance of homosexual lifestyles.
To put the sanctity of places of worship in perspective, the second intifada was set off when Ariel Sharon, a Jew, visited the Dome of the Rock, a Muslim holy place. This caused many unfortunate deaths and terrible suffering, and this just from him visiting; imagine if he had put on a performance about Judaism. Interestingly, I have yet to hear anyone speak out against the action of those who began rioting for having their holy place disrespected. Take that in contrast with what you think the reaction would be if a Christian group were to demonstrate against Queer & Allied Activism holding a performance in a Christian place of worship.
So, while I think it is worthwhile to stand up against hate mongers and give some protection to an oppressed minority group, I think that it is also worthwhile to ask Queer & Allied Activism why they insist on holding functions in inflammatory locations. Many moderate, loving Christians who might support the aims of the Laramie Project to end homophobia (they might not like homosexuality, but they hate the sin and love the sinner) find it irritating to have such functions held at a chapel. Who, then, will stand up for their interests? After you join hands against the Westboro Baptist Church, make sure to ask Queer & Allied Activism exactly why the chapel was the only suitable place for their performance. I guess Culbreth, Old Cabell, the Chemistry auditorium, the classrooms in Clark, and every other suitable spot on Grounds was taken.
In conclusion, I hope for a peaceable conclusion to the performance of the Laramie Project and hope that it does help to dispel some of the hate surrounding homosexuals. However, remember that just as you don’t have to be a homosexual to protect their rights and interests, in the same way you don’t have to be a Christian to protect their rights and interests either. If Queer & Allied Activism wants to have its interests respected, it should begin by respecting the interests of others.
Barrett Hunter
CLAS IV
Read More
LETTER: It is critical to hold individual hazers accountable
By Todd Shelton | 2 days agoBut while education is absolutely integral to hazing prevention, we must also hold individuals accountable for their hazing behavior.
LETTER: Misunderstanding the Honor Committee’s mental health procedures
By Seamus Oliver and Alexander Church | March 15, 2024We recognize that the Honor process can be stressful and that any student may benefit from support, regardless of an underlying health condition.
LETTER: Mischaracterizing a tangled war
By Michael Liebermann | February 2, 2024We should not address this war with blind idealism. We should address it, instead, with nuance and care.
