Financial aid: the anti-drug?
By Josh Goodman | February 5, 2003An ongoing debate over a federal law raises the question of whether the government should just say no to giving financial aid to students with drug convictions. As part of the 1998 reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, a law initially passed in 1965, Congress inserted a regulation preventing students with certain drug convictions from receiving financial aid. Students who are convicted of drug possession once are denied aid for a year, twice are denied aid for two years, and thrice are denied aid indefinitely. A first conviction for selling drugs prompts a two-year denial of aid, while any second sales conviction prompts an indefinite suspension. Students can start receiving aid again before their suspension period is up, if they complete a drug rehabilitation program that meets certain government standards. Underage use or possession of alcohol or cigarettes is not covered under the law. Congressman Mark Souder, R-Ind., the law's original sponsor, says the rules are justified to ensure that the government's money is spent in the best possible way. "Students who receive financial aid from taxpayer money should live within the law," Souder spokesman Seth Becker said. Inconsistent Enforcement Though Souder continues to favor the concept of the law, Becker said Souder has not been pleased by the way it has worked in practice, particularly over the last two years. Though the provision became law in 1998, it was loosely enforced by Bill Clinton's administration. During Clinton's tenure, students who left the question about drug convictions blank on their Free Application for Federal Student Aid form were able to receive aid, said Ben Gaines, coordinator of the Coalition for Higher Education Act Reform. Under George W.


