Matt Waring's Nov. 16 Opinion column, "The dishonor of apathy," claimed that because the jury in the open honor trial voted the accused students violated the honor code for act and intent, the jury believed they knowingly violated the honor code. Because the definition of intent includes whether the accused students knew, or should have known, it is impossible to say whether the jury believed they knowingly violated the honor code.
Read More
HAWKINS: The Virginia Supreme Court’s decision was sound — attacks against it are not
By Joshua Hawkins | 6 days agoIn Virginia, constitutional limits do not yield to political expediency.
PARTING SHOT: Why Cav Daily?
By Naima Sawaya | May 16, 2026And yet, I am realizing now, that over the course of two years during which I asked this question of my staff, I never wrote down my “why."
PARTING SHOT: It all works out in the end?
By Grace Traxler | May 16, 2026As I prepare to graduate, I can’t say for sure that it all works out in the end.
