News
By Chris Hall
|
March 17, 2005
A newly revised set of polices and procedures for dealing with sexual assault in the University community was announced by Vice President of Student Affairs Patricia Lampkin yesterday.
Additionally, the Sexual Assault Board has adopted a new set of operating principles including the suggestion to form a permanent advisory committee to research the issue of sexual assault within the University.
Among the revisions to the University's procedures for cases of sexual assault, the confidentiality required during the Sexual Assault Board's hearing is more clearly defined, SAB Chair Shamim Sisson said.
"The new procedures spell out more clearly the way in which confidentiality needs to be maintained in the process," Sisson said.
Although the preparation and the process of the sexual assault hearings will remain confidential, the accusing party and the accused party both have a right to a determination letter, which states the SAB's final decision and includes the sanction imposed on any individual found guilty.
"If a student decides to disclose this information, they may do that," Sisson said.
Sisson also said the University recommends that the student discuss disclosing the information provided on the determination letter with legal council before talking about it, in order to avoid allegations of libel.
The revised procedures "are a clear response to the student concern that the required confidentiality may have been overbroad and an abridgement of their rights," Sisson said.
Terms used in the procedures have been redefined, particularly the difference between sexual assault and a slightly lesser offense, sexual misconduct.