Since last June, when the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because it contains the words "under God," the nation has hotly debated the precise meaning of this phrase and all of the implications that go along with it.
The two 9th Circuit Court judges who wrote the majority opinion weren't kooky when they made their decision -- their arguments were based on historical circumstances and a careful, conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Their reasoning, however, is ultimately shortsighted and fails to take into account the so-called "ceremonial deism" that pervades American patriotism and culture.
Last Tuesday the 9th Circuit granted a 90-day stay on their original ruling, anticipating a probable Supreme Court hearing on the issue in late April. If Michael Newdow had gotten his way, however, 9.6 million schoolchildren in nine Western states would have stopped reciting the Pledge of Allegiance as of yesterday -
Read More
ANDERSON: Be lazy
By Beckett Anderson | YesterdayTrue laziness means trusting yourself to lead your own life.
HAWKINS: Virginia’s budget ‘compromise’ tries and fails
By Joshua Hawkins | 5 days agoAs families across our Commonwealth struggle to make ends meet, Virginians are yet again saddled with a state legislature with no concept of what the public actually wants.
KURTZWEIL: Keep Virginia’s energy Virginian
By Paul Kurtzweil | July 27, 2026This merger will only make Dominion and NextEra more powerful, but the benefits to taxpayers are slim.
